This casefile an appeal to determine whether land sold to plaintiff in 1856 was a void sale. No county listed

This case is an appeal to an earlier case, "Calvin Norris & Mahalia Norris v. C. L. Dalton & Betsy Dalton", located in Box ET79.

Annie Lee Harwood claims that Milne was driving negligently at great speed and was driving said in such a manner as to have no control thereof and was not keeping a lookout ahead as required by law and the result was a collision with plaintiff's car. The Milne brings this case to appellate review on a motion for a new trial. Exhibit: 9 photos that show the street and the car that the action involved. 2 folders.

This case file is a motion for an appeal in a case where a judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error to repay a promissory note.

Appeal on a previous case involving a lease on a property and paid interest on it.

R. B. Riggs surviving partner of N. C. Riggs & Son. Plaintiff earlier brought suit against defendant and won. Details of this lawsuit are not given.

Peter Missemery also listed as defendant. Original bill was a plea of trespassing and damages in the total of $200 against Britton, which resulted in a judgment against Smith.

Case involved a dispute over the possession of a mule, described as "one Mare mouse colored mule about 15 hand about six years rated at Seventy Five Dollars" that the defendant unlawfully seized. This appeal by the plaintiff states that the courts ruling for the defendant was controversial-see assignment of errors.

This petition came as a result of a case which originally had Johnson sued Chilton for debt.

The plaintiffs are seeking the reversal of a previous judgment made in favor of the defendants. Original cause of action unknown.

This case file is an appeal for a case where Plaintiff alleged that defendant company sold him an ice cream cone maker, however the machine was determine to have patents held by the McLaren Corporation, who sued Plaintiff for patent infringement. Plaintiff sued defendant company for damages resulting from suit. Additional Defendant: Paul Campbell

In the original case, Carey was convicted of unlawfully carrying deadly weapons on his person. The weapons included belt pistols, pocket pistols and revolvers against the peace and dignity of the state. Carey appealed this conviction.

This is the appeal by the Memphis Street Railway Company from a prior judgment. See WT Box 1973 for the original case. Includes published copy of "Assignment of Errors, Brief and Argument" and "Petition for Certiorari".

Defendants originally won judgment of $250 plus costs against plaintiff in 1905. Plaintiff appealed decision; in 1906 judgment affirmed when plaintiff defaulted. Plaintiff seeks new appeal, maintains that the earlier default was caused only by the failure of plaintiff's counsel to arrive on time. Nature of original lawsuit not stated.

An appeal of a prior judgment between the two parties. The original case deals with the settlement of the estate of Jabob Robinson

Original trial was for robbery

Other plaintiffs: George Steetley (also spelled Stratley).

Milligan is plaintiff, West defendant. West appealing from court decision against him for $74.75. Court ruled in favor of plaintiff again and defendant is indebted to Milligan for $96.41 Defendant moves for new trial, is rejected, and the appealed again.

The plaintiff in error, Union Mutual Life Insurance, has initiated the appeal of a circuit court verdict against them for $2,892.87. Represented by Nashville lawyer, J. C. Bradford--Union Mutual is appealing the case Sallie D. Patterson v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Portland, Maine. A brief is included that was published in the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Dec. Term 1893. The dispute is over a life insurance policy.

Defendant was the owner of a black sow, and filed previous case because he believed that the plaintiff in error unlawfully seized from defendant's possession. This case was filed as an appeal to the previous case.

McMurry seeks to appeal a judgment against him in a prior hearing. He states that he was not present at the former hearing and did not know of the charges against him until he was told there was a warrant out for him. He claims his signature was forged.

A petition for disbarment was executed against the plaintiff, an attorney at law, in 1916 from the Memphis Bar. The plaintiff was found guilty of impropriety and dishonesty during his duty. This case is a petition to overrule the previous judgment.

Original cause of action is debt and involves the wholesale purchase of grocery products by Wilhoit and Co. from Bansemer and Co. It appears that the defendant did not receive the products ordered and refused to honor payment agreement. The case file includes descriptions and prices of various grocery products. W. G. Bansemer and G. A. Bansemer are partners in W. G. Bansemer and Co. and E. Wilhoit and William Vanhup are partners in Wilhoit and Co.