This casefile an appeal to determine whether land sold to plaintiff in 1856 was a void sale. No county listed

This case is an appeal to an earlier case, "Calvin Norris & Mahalia Norris v. C. L. Dalton & Betsy Dalton", located in Box ET79.

Annie Lee Harwood claims that Milne was driving negligently at great speed and was driving said in such a manner as to have no control thereof and was not keeping a lookout ahead as required by law and the result was a collision with plaintiff's car. The Milne brings this case to appellate review on a motion for a new trial. Exhibit: 9 photos that show the street and the car that the action involved. 2 folders.

This case file is a motion for an appeal in a case where a judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error to repay a promissory note.

Defendant initially sued plaintiff for capital stock dividends not paid, judgment was in favor of defendant. This case file is a motion for an appeal of that case. Exhibit: Document: Report of the meeting of the Stockholders of Greeneville, Paint, Rock and Railroad Co.

This petition came as a result of a case which originally had Johnson sued Chilton for debt.

The plaintiffs are seeking the reversal of a previous judgment made in favor of the defendants. Original cause of action unknown.

This case file is an appeal for a case where Plaintiff alleged that defendant company sold him an ice cream cone maker, however the machine was determine to have patents held by the McLaren Corporation, who sued Plaintiff for patent infringement. Plaintiff sued defendant company for damages resulting from suit. Additional Defendant: Paul Campbell

This case seems to be an appeal only. The original case involved dispute over stud horses. Several witness testimonies are included.

This is an appeal for a case where defendant sued plaintiff. Appeal questioned the jurisdiction of the Justice of the Peace. Incomplete file.

This is an appeal only.

Defendants originally won judgment of $250 plus costs against plaintiff in 1905. Plaintiff appealed decision; in 1906 judgment affirmed when plaintiff defaulted. Plaintiff seeks new appeal, maintains that the earlier default was caused only by the failure of plaintiff's counsel to arrive on time. Nature of original lawsuit not stated.

This is the appeal by the Memphis Street Railway Company from a prior judgment. See WT Box 1973 for the original case. Includes published copy of "Assignment of Errors, Brief and Argument" and "Petition for Certiorari".

An appeal of a prior judgment between the two parties. The original case deals with the settlement of the estate of Jabob Robinson

Notes previous bond to pay the corporation for unknown causes in the face of destruction of property.

Original trial was for robbery

Other plaintiffs: George Steetley (also spelled Stratley).

This suit was instituted to recover on a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant and also to recover penalties for the wilful, malicious and flagrant failure to pay said policy. Assignments of error present for a review by this court include: that the policy was secured by means of false and fraudulent representations, that he failed to give written notice of loss within sixty days and that the conduct of the plaintiff was such as to justify the recovery of the penalty provided by statute.

The plaintiff in error, Union Mutual Life Insurance, has initiated the appeal of a circuit court verdict against them for $2,892.87. Represented by Nashville lawyer, J. C. Bradford--Union Mutual is appealing the case Sallie D. Patterson v. Union Mutual Life Insurance Co. of Portland, Maine. A brief is included that was published in the Supreme Court of Tennessee, Dec. Term 1893. The dispute is over a life insurance policy.

Original cause of action is debt and involves the wholesale purchase of grocery products by Wilhoit and Co. from Bansemer and Co. It appears that the defendant did not receive the products ordered and refused to honor payment agreement. The case file includes descriptions and prices of various grocery products. W. G. Bansemer and G. A. Bansemer are partners in W. G. Bansemer and Co. and E. Wilhoit and William Vanhup are partners in Wilhoit and Co.

The estate of Lyons is seeking payment on a note made by Christian. Christian originally made the note in order to borrow money to partially pay for a slave boy purchased from Levi Lynch. There is an issue of whether the note was to be repaid in Confederate money or U.S. Dollars.

McMurry seeks to appeal a judgment against him in a prior hearing. He states that he was not present at the former hearing and did not know of the charges against him until he was told there was a warrant out for him. He claims his signature was forged.