Order Cases Online
The files located in the Tennessee Supreme Court Cases represent an especially valuable resource for historical and genealogical research at the Tennessee State Library and Archives [TSLA].
Use quotes for an exact search. ex. "J. W."
View Entry | Year | Case Name | County | Cause/Crime | Case Description | Division | Location | # Pages | Order |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
View Entry | 1873 | Alexander Jackson v. George G. Perkins | Madison | Taxation, Assessment |
George Perkins was Sheriff of Madison County during the 1860s-1870s. |
West | Range: 84 Section: C Shelf: Box Number: 41 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1908 | A. Fry v. Mayor & Alderman of the Town of Camden | Benton | Taxation, Assessment |
The plaintiff tried to recover taxes he believed to be wrongly assessed by the town of Camden. |
West | Range: 80 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 1052 | 54 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1916 | Bransford Realty Company v. Davidson County et al. | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional defendant - Felix Z. Wilson, Trustee |
Middle | Range: 21 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 79 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1944 | City of Knoxville v. James A Keith et al. | Knox | Taxation, Assessment |
Add. def.: F. E. Loghead, Claiborne C. Cook, W. B. Stansberry, Henry & Lela Harris, Roy Bradley, B. F. Moyers, W. H. Hannum, Enoch Marshall, G. T. Wise, Mathew Mayes, Charlotte Martin, Lillian Eudailey, Francis E. Prince, L. M. Scruggs, Mary E. Gamble, Ada Whaley, B. H. Spankle, Mary Llewelling, Anna Mae Hatcher, Sommer Arrowood, George Child, J. F. Hatcher, E. C. Nicholson, A. S. Gillespie, R. L. Atkins, Pearl Hackney, Sallie Yoder, Jasper Wallace, Ulysses Wise, Nellie Roberts, 3 others. |
East | Range: 7 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 595 | 92 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1928 | City of Brownsville v. Frank A. Reid, et. Al. | Haywood | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional defendants: Brownsville Cotton Oil & Ice Company, J. R. Flippin, President, and Electric Bond & Share Company. Frank Reid was the Trustee for Brownsville Cotton Oil & Ice Co. Lawsuit was filed for taxes due to the city that dated back to 1925. Includes several printed documents such as a Petition to Rehear, a Reply Brief for City of Brownsville, Reply Brief for Frank Reid, and Assignment of Errors and Brief for Brownsville. |
West | Range: 77 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 2016 | 246 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1871 | City of Memphis v. The Jackson Insurance Co. of Memphis | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
City of Memphis challenged whether or not The Jackson Insurance Company was subject to property taxation. |
West | Range: 84 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 26 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1873 | City of Memphis v. W. J. Hicks et al. | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Case concerns taxation of the value of bonds held by the defendant. Additional defendant listed as H.E. Jackson. |
West | Range: 84 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 63 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1913 | County of Van Buren v. Jeremiah Seitzinger | Van Buren | Taxation, Assessment | West | Range: 83 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 240 | 38 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1883 | E. R. Hart v. W. E. Butler | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment | West | Range: 83 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 232 | 30 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1882 | Fairman Rogers v. The Taxing District of Shelby County | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment | West | Range: 83 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 204 | 178 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1936 | First National Bank of Chattanooga v. Charlie S. Coffey, et al. | Hamilton | Taxation, Assessment | East | Range: 7 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 747 | 62 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1913 | Forrest Hill Cemetery Company v. J. H. Creath et al. | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional Defendant: John B. Thomason. Creath was trustee of Shelby County and Thomason was state revenue agent. |
West | Range: 79 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 1314 | 30 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1932 | George R. Dempster commissioner of finance& taxation v. Roy C. Wallace comptroller of the treasury | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Opinion only. Davidson County case found in East TN boxes. |
East | Range: 5 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 83 | 8 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1942 | Hamilton National Bank of Knoxville v. City of Knoxville et al. | Knox | Taxation, Assessment |
Exhibits include correspondences, tax & assessment documents, Add. Defendants: E. V. Cullum, J. W. Crudgington, C. V. Biddle, E. E. Carter, Ed L. Keener, D. A. Schaeffer. |
East | Range: 7 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 597 | 112 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1902 | Hernando Insurance Co. v. City of Memphis | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment | West | Range: 81 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 861 | 22 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1906 | I. M. Darnell & Son Company v. City of Memphis et al. | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
The plaintiff owned and operated a lumber business in Memphis |
West | Range: 80 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 1038 | 37 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1918 | I. B. Clement, Exec. For Tom Fleming v. The City of Memphis & E. R. Parham | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Clement sued on behalf of the Tom Fleming, claiming the City of Memphis collected a personal property tax from Fleming though Fleming and his wife were living in Millington. Parham was the revenue collection agent. Amount sued for was $676.89 plus interest, dating for the years of 1914-1916. |
West | Range: 79 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 1559 | 70 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1879 | Joseph Ruohs v. J. E. Conner et al. | Hamilton | Taxation, Assessment |
Ruohs stated that he purchased all real and personal property of the Mountain City Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Company. He claimed that additional taxes were levied on the sale after the original assessment was made. Clouding the situation were whether Ruohs or the mill entity was assessed and whether the assessor included the associated acreage. Others involved: William Rogers and T. M. McConnell. Those interested in period machinery may find interest in the short mill inventory. |
East | Range: 19 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 1688 | 30 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1884 | J. M. Bradford v. J. M. Jenkins | Lauderdale | Taxation, Assessment |
Defendant Jenkins was trustee for Lauderdale County in this dispute about railroad taxes. |
West | Range: 83 Section: C Shelf: Box Number: 251 | 23 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1887 | J. D. McCurdy v. T. J. Swift et al | Montgomery | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional defendants: Smith Batson, R.A. Harvey, E.C. Swift, and C.J. Swift. Determining which party is responsible for taxes and part of purchase money owed on a tract of land. |
West | Range: 35 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 795 | 59 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1875 | Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. Thomas L. Ellis & D. L. Johnson | Sumner | Taxation, Assessment |
Complainant filed a petition against H. M. Austin, County Judge and T. L. Ellis, tax collector of said county for a writ of certiorari to bring before the court an certain tax assessment. Complainants compelled the judge to show by what authority said assessment was made. |
Middle | Range: 20 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 17a | 51 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1886 | Mississippi& Tennessee Railroad Company v. Heiskell& Heiskell, F. F. Edmondson,& C. F. Vance | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Depositions are included in a separate file. |
West | Range: 83 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 302 | 141 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1930 | Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Henderson County, TN., et. Al. | Henderson | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional defendant: T. R. Sisson, Trustee of Henderson County. Plaintiff sued and claimed that part of their tax assessment was invalid. Case was based on Private Chapter 417 of the Acts of 1929. Plaintiff claimed assessment to pay county officials salaries was unconstitutional. Plaintiff sued on behalf of itself and all taxpayers of Henderson County. |
West | Range: 77 Section: F Shelf: Box Number: 2032 | 52 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1921 | Neuhoff Packing Company v. Vernon Sharp, City Tax Assessor | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment | Middle | Range: 33 Section: C Shelf: Box Number: 437 | 400 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1858 | Orville Paine v. John Crawford | Rhea | Taxation, Assessment |
Paine complained that county tax assessor Crawford assessed his land at a higher value than its worth. |
East | Range: 9 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 1179 | 12 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1880 | Peter Kuntz v. J. H. Galbreath, agent for Davidson County, Tenn. | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment | Middle | Range: 20 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 65 | 0 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1898 | R. B. Snowden v. F. T. Edmondson, et al. | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Edmondson is the Tax Collector & Attorney for the Taxing District of Shelby County, which is also a defendant in this case. Claimant complains that his tax assessment rate is excessive and unjust. |
West | Range: 82 Section: G Shelf: Box Number: 644 | 52 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1837 | State v. Planters Bank | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Amount of taxes - $1500.00 |
Middle | Range: 32 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 200 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1884 | State v. George K. Whitworth | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Action brought by state to force Defender, a revenue collector for the state, to assess and tax specific stock dividends. Reply brief only, no case summary included. |
Middle | Range: 33 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 496 | 47 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1937 | Sanford Realty Company v. City of Knoxville, et al. Hugh W. Sanford v. City of Knoxville, et al. Mary Ross Baker v. City of Knoxville, et al. | Knox | Taxation, Assessment |
Plaintiffs argued that their properties had been assessed too high. Other defendants: R. Rex Wallace, J. L. Deaver, H. Clay Ammons, William P. Seaton, and W. E. Gilbert. One oversize envelope contains property-related documents. |
East | Range: 8 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 1016 | 158 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1885 | State et al. v. W. B. Renfro & others | Maury | Taxation, Assessment |
Defendants too numerous to list. Defendants J. T. Sand and G. T. Greenfield are the owners as tenants in common of a piece of land in Williams. Taxes were not paid and the lot was sold. Exhibit on page 19, taxes assessed to T. G. Greenfield. |
Middle | Range: 34 Section: F Shelf: Box Number: 712 | 51 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1894 | State, use, etc., & Grundy County v. Tennessee Coal, Iron, and Railroad Co. | Grundy | Taxation, Assessment |
This was a suit brought by the State for the use of Grundy County against the defendant to collect taxes for the years 1891, 1892, and 1893 claimed to have been legally back assessed for said years. Casefile includes a copy of the Tennessee Coal, Iron, and Railroad by-laws, as well as an analysis of its finances. 2 folders. |
Middle | Range: 36 Section: C Shelf: Box Number: 1002 | 134 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1891 | State & Grundy County v. Tennessee Coal Iron, & Railroad Co. et al. | Grundy | Taxation, Assessment |
Add. Def: Stockholders of the Tennessee Coal Iron and R. R. Co. This suit was brought to recover taxes back-assessed for the years 1886, 1887, and 1888 against the defendant company upon its capital stock and real estate, and against its stockholders upon their shares of stock. The def. denies the validity and regularity of the assessment, the taxability of it capital stock, and its liability for taxes due from its shareholders. Exhibit material includes R. R. Co. booklet. 2 folders. |
Middle | Range: 35 Section: F Shelf: Box Number: 917 | 331 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1837 | State v. Union Bank | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment | Middle | Range: 32 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 200 | 0 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1882 | State et al. v. H. G. Scovel et al. | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional Plaintiffs: Mayor and City Council of Nashville, B. J. Lea, Jno. Ruhm, Thomas L. Dodd, and W.K. McAlister. Additional Defendants: Jacob McDavid, and W. A. Whitseet(?) Additional defendants from Massachusetts: J. Hayden, Jack(?) Hayden Jr., Jack Hayden, Ereven(?) Hayden |
Middle | Range: 20 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 67 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1920 | Swift & Company v. Romans Hailey, Clerk et al | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional parties: L. B. Ormes |
Middle | Range: 21 Section: F Shelf: Box Number: 138 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1882 | State v. W. E. Butler, et al | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Samuel Mosby |
West | Range: 83 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 197 | 29 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1885 | Shelby County v. The Mississippi& Tennessee Rail Road Co. | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment | West | Range: 83 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 287 | 131 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1888 | State v. Gabe Judah, et al. | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional Defendants: James W. Richardson, D. H. Porter, Alice Mahan, and Imogene Beaumont. |
West | Range: 83 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 420 | 20 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1947 | State for use of City of Chattanooga v. Ethel Bayles, et al. | Hamilton | Taxation, Assessment |
City has liens on property owned by each Defendant stemming from unpaid taxes. Exhibits include tax bill, tax schedules. 26 additional defendants. |
East | Range: 6 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 481 | 108 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1907 | State, ex rel, Z. N. Estes v. Thomas J. Taylor | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment | West | Range: 81 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 946 | 30 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1885 | State v. R. D. Smith | Maury | Taxation, Assessment |
The issue in question is the payment of real estate taxes from 1880-1885. The defendant claims that the years 1880-1882 are exempt because of an act by the General Assembly that states that prohibits collecting taxes from three years ago. Historical note: the property being assessed includes the Athenaeum: an all girls school in Columbia. |
Middle | Range: 35 Section: C Shelf: Box Number: 806 | 10 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1880 | State et al. v. Gregory et al.. | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Taxes due on a tract of land known as Dobbs Land which was purchased by Jno Ballentine. This was a note from the clerk and master of the Chancery court, Robert Ewing. Incomplete case file. |
Middle | Range: 35 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 738 | 1 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1915 | Theodore Read v. John B. Thomason et al. | Davidson | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional defendants - R. R. Sneed and Porter Dunlap |
Middle | Range: 21 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 171 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1873 | The City of Memphis v. William M. Farmington et al. stockholders in the Union & Planters Bank | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
File includes a list of the shareholders of the Union and Planters Bank of Memphis, "as assessed by the city of Memphis for taxes". |
West | Range: 84 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 68 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1871 | The City of Memphis v. The Savings Bank of Memphis | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
City of Memphis challenged whether or not The Savings Bank of Memphis was subject to property taxation. |
West | Range: 84 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 26 | 0 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1948 | Takoma Hospital & Sanatorium Training School, Inc. | Greene | Taxation, Assessment | East | Range: 7 Section: F Shelf: Box Number: 651 | 249 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1921 | Vesta Gas Range & Manufacturing Company v. Hamilton County, et al. | Hamilton | Taxation, Assessment | Middle | Range: 21 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 160 | 0 | Order A Copy | |
View Entry | 1901 | William H. Carroll v. The County of Shelby & J. H. Alsup | Shelby | Taxation, Assessment |
Carroll believed that his property value was too high and that he was paying excessive taxes. Alsup was the Collector of Taxes. |
West | Range: 81 Section: A Shelf: Box Number: 745 | 30 | Order A Copy |
View Entry | 1874 | Young & Walker v. I. E. Brashear, et al. | Decatur | Taxation, Assessment |
Additional complainants: Charles B. Young, John W. Walker. Additional defendants: C.P. Spence, Revenue Collector of Decatur County, Justices of the Peace of Decatur County. Complaining that Quorum Court assigned a value to property which it was not authorized to do and thereby increased the property taxes. |
West | Range: 84 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 48 | 0 | Order A Copy |