Judgment only. Court says insufficient evidence of bad faith by defendant to have gone to a jury.

This case was argued over 192 barrels of potatoes. Charles claims that Carter would not allow him to inspect the potatoes before taking possession of them. Number of pages includes 2 documents, one unnamed.

Exhibits: correspondence, certificate, enrollment agreement.

On promises and covenants broken, Beech given $500 in damages

Additional defendants: D. H. Talley, J. B. Murfree, A. Jetten. E. W. Talley and D. H. Talley are surviving partners of Talley & Co. The Talleys along with Murfree and Jetten are executors of P. C. Talley, deceased. Leonidas Gray and Alsup G. Gray are partners in A. W. Gray & Sons. The contract was to pay value plus interest of machinery after the sell of said machinery (two horse thresher). A. W. Gray & Sons is also listed as A. W. Gray's Sons in the case.

Plaintiff brought an action to recover $200 for services rendered under a contract of employment by the defendant as a school teacher at the Wartrace High Graded Common School. The controversy in this case was whether the plaintiff was hired during a legal meeting of the board of education, which consisted of: J. W. Holt, J. W. Shriver, J. W. Templeton, J. E. Justice, J. A. Cunningham, and B. F. Cleveland.

Roberts claims that Morrisson intentionally misrepresented his position as superintendent.

Sully claimed A.B. Harris, R.A. Johnson, and the Carnegie Land Co. breached their contract with him regarding the buying of stock. The bill "prays that the defendants be enjoined from transferring any stock standing in the name of Harris and Johnson." Alfred Sully was a citizen of New York

architectural drawings on p. 58-60.

Andersons (mom & son) sued Richmond, whose land adjoined theirs, for breach of contract & allowing his stock to trespass on their field, thereby damaging the corn. Andersons said they had contract with Richmond that each would take care of their own stock since no fence between their respective farms. Justice of the Peace ruled for Plaintiffs, Circuit Court reversed & ruled for Defendants, & Plaintiffs appealed to SC. Witnesses: James Murray, U.R. Upchurch, W.G. Sowell, Wm Lawson, Henry Carter, others.

The plaintiff made a contract with the defendant in 1888 to cultivate his land and he was to furnish the land and a mare. Each party was to bear half of the labor and the plaintiff was to feed the mare used to work the fields. After two months and before the work was done, the defendant took back the mare, halting any yield from the crops. The defendant was damaged $50 for feed provided and a breach of contract.

Kee was employed by Jordan, but never received payment for his work.

Mayor: G. P. Ware. Aldermen: W. F. Johnson, Harding Smith, Jonathan Eader, William Sangster, G. W. Bennett, Robert Claiborn, Phillip Yancy, & J. P. Turner.

Additional Plaintiff: The East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RR Co. Defendant charged railroad with breach of contract for not providing sufficient seating as there were no seats available after he purchased his ticket. Defendant forcibly ejected from from train & sued railroad for $10,000. Railroad maintains its actions were justifiable given his behavior.

Defendant accused of breach a real estate sales contract. Small plat map, privilege licenses, sales contract. Plaintiff alias: Bewley Realty Co.

The defendants operated a railway to carry merchandise between St. Petersburg and Columbia. The plaintiffs contracted with the defendant to transport 1,200 hogs between St. Petersburg and Columbia. Defendants refused to receive hogs for transportation. Defendants had to transport hogs by wagon and lost money on the sale of the hogs at market.

The parties entered into a contract for carrying freight on the railway. The plaintiff was suing the railway for breach of contract charging that the railway did not transfer or ship property as agreed upon by the contract.

Ed McFerrin is noted as being colored. Case concerns a contract for Ed McFerrin to farm on land owned by B. L. McFerrin and to divide up the corn crop grown on the land.

Plaintiffs claim that they had a contract with defendant to haul a specific amount lumber for wages. Defendant claims that they did not have a contract for a specific amount of lumber.

Belmont Candy Company contracted with Evans to hire him as a traveling salesman. Due to the start of the war and that Evans was in new territory, his sales did not meet the companies expectations. The company reduced the amount they paid him; however, the contract "did not require him to sell any quantity or value of goods but obligated him to devote his whole time and energy exclusively to the interests of the candy company and there is no claim that he failed."