This case is regarding the sale of what was known as the Patrick Nash land. The purchase of this tract of land was for usage of mining copper ore, minerals, wood, and water. Additional Defendants: William H. Peet. Exhibit: Newspaper clipping advertising sale

Additional Defendants: A. R. Wood & P. C. Isbull. This case concerns a land dispute in which Gaither purchased a tract of land from Haufman. The deed and/or register papers for this tract of land were destroyed during the war and Haufman later claimed that Gaither was not the legal owner of the land.

Incomplete file. This is an opinion of a case that defendant was lawfully in possession of some property but not entitled to exclusive enjoyment of the profits. Specific type of property unnamed. County and court not listed

Additional Defendants: Benjamin F. Puckett and William A. Puckett, exers of Charles Puckett, dec., Hiram Jenkins, Nancy Jenkins, Henrya Kirbey, Mahala Kirbey, Charlotte Lindsley, Walter Key, Thomas Powell, Sally Powell, and James F. Fletcher. Case involves the fraudulent sale of land.

Years before this suit Jesse Robinson purchased land in Fentress County from Crouch for $350. All but $71 was paid at the time of purchase. In 1866 Crouch filed a bill against the Robinsons to collect the debt. Robinson was dead by this point and sued his wife and heirs to collect.

Hon. Irving Halsey, Judge, 2nd Circuit Court of Shelby County. Petition for Scire Facias. John B. Hill, Jacob Brown, E. Ackerman

These two cases were consolidated. This case concerns the sale of land of the estate of Joshua Miller of which R. H. Young, the debter of Wolford & James & Jones was the owner. Both parties claim fraud by writ of attachment. Thomas Miller, exe. of Joshua Miller procured the sale of a tract of land of the estate of his testor, under decree of Chancery Court at the sale Young was the purchaser at $1000.

Additional plaintiffs: Kate L. Bennett, Joseph F. Stamps, T. Eva Stamps, William H. Johnson, James Johnson, M. J. Johnson, John D. Bennett. Plaintiffs claimed that the sale of the land was illegal and void. Plaintiffs claimed that Mary Johnson, the widow of the deceased had no authority to sale the land in question.

Plaintiff filed suit to recover the residue from the sale of a tract of land sold under a previous decree of the chancery court

In 1870, Looney sold to Taylor a tract of land in Franklin County for $6120.50. Looney claimed that Taylor failed to pay him even though Taylor has had control of the land and its profits since the sale.

James G. Reid and John H. Reid are indebted to John E. Pearson. The amount of the land and the title of the land is the issue in this case.

Baxter is noted as being a citizen of Gibson County. Wood is noted as being a citizen of Lauderdale County.

Case is incomplete; summary and exhibit only.

This case is for a the petition of a tract of land, 34 acres, in Johnson County owned by the complainant and defendant as tenants in common. The land was left to them by their father, Leonard Shoun. There was a small body of land adjacent to the 34 acres but instead of getting a grant they had the original tract of land surveyed in connection with 34 acres and obtained a grant to jointly tenant for entire tract of about 370 acres.

Mary Norman, died in November 1860 having appointed John L. Hix the executor of her estate. Hix sold her real estate in December 1860 for 54 cents per acre. It was said the land was 230 acres but was surveyed at 264 acres. Alfred Campbell bought Norman's land and then later sold it to James L. Hix. Then James L. Hix sold it to John L. Hix.

This case is regarding the sale of land that was granted by the State Additional Defendant: Irby Morgan, trustee, C.E. Hallman, J.O. Shackelford. Exhibit: Newspaper clipping announcing date and details of sale

In 1845, William Anderson, a merchant of Chattanooga, was indebted to a member of a mercantile firm in the city of Baltimore. Brabsob Attorneys obtained judgments for $5000 debt. The land purchased with the note was sold and to be distributed to creditors of defendant. This bill was filed for approval of conveyance of the land.

This case is regarding a tract of land which was deeded to plaintiff by her father in 1822. Co-plaintiff, who died in 1868, conveyed the land to defendant. Plaintiff filed this bill to recover land from defendant. Plaintiff claimed only half of the land was conveyed, defendants claim entire tract was conveyed. Additional Plaintiff: Brien O'Brien

Additional Defendant: Mary Hildreth. Case involves a challenge of the lien placed on the wife's land sold by the husband without her consent; she was not privy examined by an officer of the law. Case also involves a dispute over confederate money.