Plaintiff: M.C. Roger. Crowson was the father-in-law of George Amenine, who was indicted for larceny and Crowson was forced to give security of $2,000. Motion for a new trial.

Samuel Edison is the Next Friend representing the plaintiff. Additional defendants: Richard Cape, Martha Walfe, Samuel Walfe, Sarah Walfe, Arthur Walfe, and S. F. Wells. Amanda Bloomer is the wife of John H. Bloomer. Amanda accuses John of attempting to defraud her buy persuading her to sell to him land she inherited from her father. This case file contains information regarding the rights of married women to control personal property.

This case was filed to determine if an ordinance of the town of Greeneville forbade licensed retailers from the sale of liquor between 6 o'clock pm and 6 o'clock am is valid. The ordinance was determined to be valid.

This casefile is an appeal for a new trial Additional Plaintiff: Almeda Sartin

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

This case file is a motion for a new trial for a case where plaintiff was convicted of murder.

In the original suit Walker claimed that he was the owner of a tract of land and some employees of Line and Winchester forcibly broke into and held his land and evicted him off his own property. This case is to appeal the original case of forcible and unlawful entry and detainer.

Hon. C. W. Heiskell, Judge, Circuit Court. R. G. Portluck, Deputy Sheriff. County court refusal to pay or make any appropriation for jury services, re: Sheriff Anderson, upon execution of original venire of thirty-four men selected as jurors.

This case file is a petition for a new trial in a case where plaintiff was convicted of drunk driving.

Hart seeks judgment against Carey for money paid as co-security upon a note given by James Johnson, William Carey, and Joseph Hart to William Kincaid as part of judgment rendered in court previously. Same plaintiff, in same county, around same time period but in a case about ejectment can be found in the case William Richardson v. David Hart, exor. of Joseph Hart, dec. in box ET 9a.

Plaintiff in error previously had a judgment rendered against him in favor of defendant for damages. Defendant claimed in previous case that the livestock of plaintiff in error destroyed his garden. Plaintiff in error filed this case for an appeal.

The original suit involved the paying of a debt. The suit was not properly filed by the clerk and this was not noticed by the attorney. The plaintiff calls for a motion to dismiss.

Plaintiff [Smith?] placed $873 of Ocoee money with defendant in 1866. In 1876, defendant for first time informed plaintiff that money was stolen in 1872. Plaintiff charges that it was defendant's duty to inform him immediately of theft so that plaintiff could have taken steps to recover the money or set it up in the then pending suit of F. A. Moses, admr. V. Ocoee Bank, et al. Plaintiffs charges defendant and judge concealed plaintiff's right of action.

In the original case, the plaintiff claimed that water from a broken pipe on the defendant's land caused damage to the house belonging to the plaintiff. In this case, the complainant motioned for an appeal claiming that the court did not examine the facts and that it was the natural flow of rainwater that caused the damage.

Plaintiff filed motion for the use of Harry Hancock. sued to re-tax cost of an original bill in which Porter was arrested for carrying a dirk or a knife.

Defendant initially sued plaintiff for capital stock dividends not paid, judgment was in favor of defendant. This case file is a motion for an appeal of that case. Exhibit: Document: Report of the meeting of the Stockholders of Greeneville, Paint, Rock and Railroad Co.

In the original suit, the plaintiff wishes to recover from wrongful ejectment and burning of his house. The defendant wishes for the trial to be moved because of prejudice. Note: 2 folders.

This case is a motion for a new trial where judgment was render against plaintiff for non-payment of a note. Judgment led to plaintiffs home being seized by defendant. Additional Plaintiffs: Maria Squibb and A.S. Deadrick

Plaintiff filed this case as a creditor of Paul Bowman to set aside the conveyance of a tract of land. Defendants contest the validity of plaintiff's claim Additional Defendant: Berry M. Bowman

Defendants previously secured a judgment against the plaintiffs Preston for $546. The plaintiffs now are attempting to overrule the previous judgment based on a restatement of the facts.

This casefile is a motion for a new trial in an estate dispute. File incomplete. No county or additional defendants listed.

For another case (Hugh Dowling, admr. Of James Calloway, dec. v. E.P. Cawood) Crookshanks and John W. Easley were security for Cawood. In that case, Justice ruled against Cawood for $205.70. Stinnett stayed Crookshank's note, which was never paid. Dowling had Crookshanks, Easley, and Stinnett levied to satisfy execution. Stinnett now asking for Motion for Dismiss against Crookshanks for not having agency to procur him as stayer. Court ruled in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appealed.