Complainants the heirs of Edwin Praird assert that they are entitled to the interest of Robert Easly by virtue of a levy made on his interest. Respondent denies that he died intestate, he denies that the interest was subject to a levy and so charges that the whole proceedings in the Circuit Court was void because the levy referred to was made under an ancillary attachment.

This action in response to previous suit by defendants, 1886, "brought by Calvin Childress and his wife against plaintiffs in error, for personal injuries sustained by the wife in getting off a moving train at Heiskell's Station." Incident of 7 Jan. 1886 on train from Jellico to Knoxville.

William Ferris died in 1861. The original admr. named in his will refused the duty & Layton was appointed. Layton failed to settle debts left by the estate. Layton was sued to recover $141 dollars in debt due from the estate to its lenders. The heirs expressed frustration at Layton's failure, but all money left by the estate had been used, and the heirs did not want the Ferris land sold to pay the debts.

Challenge to previous judgment rendered without defendant present. Originating court is Law, appeal to Western Division Supreme Court - not known if Chancery or Circuit

In 1867 Rexford sued for replevin in circuit court against Pulley. He attempted to recover an eight year old brown horse, damages due, or the value of these. However, Rexford was unhappy with the outcome, appealing the case, alleging errors in the proceedings.

The case file is apparently incomplete,

Judgment rendered without counsel. present; "Banfil" referred to as "Banfield" at times

In the original suit, Ferguson bought land from his grandfather's estate. When his grandfather died he claimed that land. Goodlett also claimed the land because Ferguson had not paid his debt to him. Complainant claims that the judgment made in error because the defendant as executor made a settlement with the County Court without notice of any party in interest and are not binding on them. 2 folders

Cause of action: Plaintiff appealing trial case to gain workmen compensation for death of her husband. Exhibit materials include map and photographs. Map is of Chattanooga with two x's and a path drawn between them. Oversize map located M-17-19

The appellant claims that the court erred in overruling the Statute of limitations of ten years, setting aside the satisfaction of judgment and permitting the introduction of evidence after the case was closed and was being argued.

incomplete case. Petition for writ of Certiorari. Assignment of Error #1 and #3.

Additional defs: Henrietta Asher and Alfred Redlick

Additional parties: J. W. Loyd, Samuel Langhaus, McAndrews, Julius Keister, Thomas McMillin, Henry Williams, J. W. Cradic, Dick Conners, John Stewart

Cause of action: Plaintiff is appealing his conviction for unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor.

Defendants: Stephen Cantrell and Henchy Petway.