Additional complainants: J. K. P. Alexander and T. H. Swaim, admr. of J. W. Swaim, dec.. Additional defendants: J. A. Covington and C.I.A. Brasfield. Covington was the county sheriff and Brasfield was a deputy. Related to an earlier case of H. P. Barbee v. James H. Leigh heard in Weakley County Chancery Court, 1873.

Replevin of a "Walnut Log."

Other defendants: H. K. Trammel. Defendants took a pool table (worth $300) from defendant & refused to give it back.

Additional defendants: R. V. Brooks, S. G. Gore, Eliza Gore, Elvira Patteet, J. B. Pickett, William Pickett, J. M. Morgan, Paulina Morgan, G. H. Morgan, Mary Morgan, M. G. Butler.

Plaintiff claims portion of crop of John L. Westbrook, the same seized by J. Lomax, Sheriff of Perry County. Additional defendant: J. L. Webb. Plaintiff had securities on replevin bond: Joseph Dabbs and V.S. Dabbs. Both securities then died. This left plaintiff unable to give security & comply with rule of court, which ruled in favor of defendants. Plaintiff appealed to Supreme Court.

Schwab claims Bounds has improperly detained $200 of Schwab's personal property (clothing, books, carpet bag, umbrellas, other personal property). First jury couldn't agree so mistrial declared. Second jury ruled in Schwab's favor. Bounds appealed. Julius Ochs testified: Schwab acquired the property at issue from Frank Houseman, who owned small store in Knoxville (S. Levi & Bros) & wanted to sell out his stock. Goods later attached as Housman's property & replevied; this suit ensued.

Add. Defendants: Cook & Valentine, Bischoff & Robatz, & Hanmer & Company. Plaintiff filed bill to recover certain horses, a barouche wagon, and gear being held in Hanmer & Company's Livery Stable. Defendant claims to have purchased the items from Hirsch Brothers, but they were not theirs to sell. The other defendants were creditors of Hirsch Brothers. Plaintiff's name also spelled "Alex Weinbaum".

Plaintiff alleged that defendant, who was the deputy sheriff, illegally seized his vehicle. Exhibit: Deed of trust for automobile

Holloway brought the original suit claiming that Griffith was unlawfully detaining his horse. Holloway employed Griffith to represent him in a separate suit and agreed to pay him by transferring a note held against Ransom Smith. Griffith later complained that the suit was more work than originally agreed upon and demanded the horse in controversy as payment. Holloway claims that Griffith took his horse to assess its value but failed to return it.

Walker is Trustee for the benefit of the Aultman Taylor Co. Plaintiff complains that the defendants unlawfully seized and are withholding one Aultman Taylor separator and one Aultman Taylor traction engine and is seeking their return. Plaintiff notes that the property was unlawfully seized from him as trustee under mortgage deed made by the defendants to him for the benefit of the Aultman Taylor Co.

Co-defendant is J. E. Frost. The plaintiff, sued for herself and her children, seeks to regain a fully-stocked drugstore from Frost, who, she says, possesses it illegally. Folder contains two legal briefs.

Plaintiffs seeks to regain possession of a pair of cows. Exhibits include cancelled checks. Add. Defendant: Roy Craig.

Persica sued the sheriff to replevin property he had seized as result of a court judgment against Annie's husband John Persica. Items included bar fixtures from her saloon: counters, a whisky case, bar mirrors, ice boxes, an iron safe, a piano, and set of barber fixtures consisting of mirrors and 3 barber chairs. It was decided that the sheriff acted illegally because the saloon contents belonged to Mrs. Persica. There are 2 copies of the 10-page statement of case. Two sets of brads could not be removed.

The case involved an ordinance regarding hogs running at large. File consists of defendant's brief only.

A. A. Boyd, entitled to possession of a certain sorrel mare now in the possession of defendant, Alexander Rider, Jr. "The said mare is about eight or nine years old, about 15 hands or thereabout. The said mare is unlawfully detained from him by said Rider, wrongfully and without authority, and he also prays a writ of Replevin."

This case is concerning the appeal for a judgment rendered against plaintiff. Plaintiff appealed the replevin of a sewing machine leased to her by defendant.

For the recovery of goods and property.

Items being replevin: numerous furniture pieces. Exhibits include cancelled check, handwritten notes, item list.

This case is a writ of replevin…The Betts Machine Company sold a machine to James Lee Jr. and the parties agreed on a payment schedule. However Lee began having problems with the machine and refused to pay the second payment. The Betts Machine Co. now seeks to take back possession of the machine. They state that the contract specified that they would retain the title to the machine and could take back possession if payments were not made.

Property in dispute consists of one 8-year-old gray mare and one 6-year-old dun-colored cow.

Replevin of a "Gray Mare." Additional case materials in ET 1912 (Range 19, Section A, Shelf 3).

Plaintiff in error is accused of withholding 425 sacks of corn belonging to the defendant in error on a flatboat on the Holston River.