Tennessee Supreme Court Cases

Use quotes for an exact search. ex. "J. W."

View Entry Year Case Name County Cause/Crime Case Description Division Location # Pages Order
View Entry 1916 Coleman Clark Grocery Co. v. Model Cash Grocery et al.. Henry Replevin

Defendants: W.T.Smith, J.E. Erwin formed a partnership called Model Cash Grocery. J.E. Erwin on behalf of Model Cash Grocery, executed a deed of trust to Coleman Clark on some of its fixtures then in the storehouse. Coleman Clark agreed to extend credit to Model Cash for one more year. Model Cash ceased to do business around 10/1/1918. When Coleman Clark came to collect their due, they were refused by W.T. Smith.

 West Range: 79 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 1556 137 Order A Copy
View Entry 1882 C. J. F. Hurt v. Calvin Allen Henry Replevin

No title page. Concerns the return of a horse.

 West Range: 84 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 209 36 Order A Copy
View Entry 1894 G. W. Swor v. S. J. Taylor Henry Replevin

Swor's minor son traded a yellow horse for a mule. The case rose out of the disputed ownership of the horse.

 West Range: 82 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 591 16 Order A Copy
View Entry 1903 Henry Spencer v. John S. Vandyke & Son Henry Replevin West Range: 81 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 840 10 Order A Copy
View Entry 1906 J. F. Anderson, admr. v. C. T. Kelley, next friend, etc. Henry Replevin

Opinion, Court of Civil Appeals. Action of replevin to recover the possession of a cow, valued at $20.00 from plaintiff in error as admr. of Mrs. Emma E. Kelley, dec.

 West Range: 81 Section: G Shelf: Box Number: 917 5 Order A Copy
View Entry 1880 Jack Berry v. J. W. Cook Henry Replevin

Case involves "a certain one eyed bay horse mule."

 West Range: 84 Section: G Shelf: Box Number: 156 0 Order A Copy
View Entry 1883 J. J. Valentine v. A. J. Hutson Henry Replevin

The property involved was a horse.

 West Range: 83 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 224 32 Order A Copy
View Entry 1915 Southern Engine & Boiler Works v. J. W. Chandler et al. Henry Replevin

Complainant entered into written contract with defendant to sell some mill property. The defendant paid $200.00 in cash and executed 3 negotiable promissory notes. The notes have not been paid and per the contract, if the notes were not paid the defendant agrees to return property to complainant. Complainant seeks to recover mill property.

 West Range: 79 Section: E Shelf: Box Number: 1480 238 Order A Copy
View Entry 1879 W.H. Hudson, Trustee of B.L. Milam v. W.H. Freeman Henry Replevin West Range: 84 Section: H Shelf: Box Number: 165 0 Order A Copy
View Entry 1912 W. R. Littleton v. James Sweeney Henry Replevin West Range: 80 Section: C Shelf: Box Number: 1082 9 Order A Copy