Tennessee Supreme Court Cases

Use quotes for an exact search. ex. "J. W."

View Entry Year Case Name County Cause/Crime Case Description Division Location # Pages Order
View Entry 1937 Armster C. Crow v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen& Firemen Unicoi Insurance Disputes

Plaintiff is a member of Lodge number 763 of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen and Firemen. Through this membership plaintiff purchased a beneficiary certificate of insurance worth $1500 protecting him against total disability. Plaintiff became totally and permanently disabled while covered under said policy but claims the defendant refuses to pay benefits. Exhibit material includes insurance policy document, correspondence, and applications for disability and allowance.

 East Range: 20 Section: D Shelf: Box Number: 1583 150 Order A Copy
View Entry 1946 Carment Evans v. Paul White, et al. Unicoi Election Dispute

Additional Defendants: T. R. Keys, Frank E. Broyles, Frank T. Gentry, Commissioners of Election for Unicoi County. This action was brought by Evans to recover the office of Sheriff of Unicoi County.

 East Range: 6 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 474 113 Order A Copy
View Entry 1933 George Mason Falls v. the Prudential Insurance Company of America Unicoi Insurance Disputes

On 1 September 1927, the plaintiff and defendant insurance company entered into contract of insurance, $2,000/mo. payments should policy holder become disabled or incapacitated. Plaintiff later developed acute pulmonary tuberculosis, became totally disabled, permanently unable to perform any work. Insurance company failed to uphold their contractual agreement. Exhibits include policy issued through Clinchfield Railroad Co., letter of correspondence. See also box 1582

 East Range: 10 Section: J Shelf: Box Number: 1553 219 Order A Copy
View Entry 1931 W. M. Higgins v. Franklin Fire Insurance Company Unicoi Insurance Disputes

Higgins sued the defendant to recover $3000 due him from insurance policy. His house was destroyed by fire and despite demanding payment of said losses from defendant, they refused to pay. Defendant cancelled said policy but because defendant failed to make payment within 60 days, the plaintiff believed he was entitled to recover a penalty not exceeding 25%. 2 folders.

 East Range: 10 Section: B Shelf: Box Number: 1347 261 Order A Copy