Appellants, partners Willis and Crittenden, entered into a building contract with appellees to build a house. Crittenden borrowed $600.00 from his bank on the strength of the building contract. However, Crittenden died before a bond was put in place. Appellants are arguing that, since Crittenden was the most capable partner and he died before execution of the bond, that the sureties should not be held.

Defendant is the administrator of the estate of his father W. F. Karnes (dec.), who is also the father of D. P. Butler. In 1909, the plaintiff purchased from W. F. Karnes a tract of land for $600, paying $100 in cash and the balance in five deferred pay- ments. Prior to his death, the plaintiffs paid $500 and also bought the homestead from the other heirs. The defendant as administrator told the plaintiffs they owed more money for the land and therefore owed the heirs more than they were paid.

married on Sept. 21, 1916 in Memphis, Tenn. and lived together until March 20, 1917; daughter Ines Dicicco; "cruel and inhuman treatment", abusive and unsafe relationship

The original suit was brought by J.E. Armstrong to recover damages against Jackson Railway & Light for death of the Armstrong child alleged to have been caused by the carelessness and negligence of the defendant in running its street car over her. 3 additional folders in Box 1583. Oversize maps showing N. Hays Ave., Laconte Ave., E. Preston St., and Middleton Ave. in Madison Co. Maps in WT Oversize Box 4.

The plaintiff wishes to enjoin the Sheriff of Shelby county from selling their real estate levied on to satisfy an execution from the Probate Court, in the hands of the Sheriff, against Patterson and Barnwell as sureties on the bond of Samuel Carson as the administrator of the estate of Eddie and Clarence Gaines, two minor children of Katie Gaines who had been killed by the Railroad. 2 folders

Exhibits include photographs of signatures, financial statements from the Commonwealth Trust Company, bank book. Marion Griffin filing a stockholders' bill in equity against the Commonwealth Trust Company after the company dissolved and allegedly did not pay out to investors. Case divided into 2 folders

Plaintiff and the Birmingham and Northwestern Railroad entered into a written contract giving the railroad company the right to run a their track through her land, with the plaintiff being paid any damages that might occur. Plaintiff is arguing that defendant failed to comply with the terms of the contract and did not pay her what the land was worth.

Additional parties: Helen Vorhees.12.